‘In my speech, I said that even if the court concludes that they are brilliant in Russian, it should not be that a person who speaks their native language was deprived of such rights. When they spoke in the first technology court, they were cut off without being allowed to enter the debate and with the last word. … Isn’t that discrimination? The court could even not interrupt at all, write in the verdict that these people spoke in Crimean Tatar, and the court did not understand them. It was possible to do different things, but not to have such a formula that a person is deprived of some rights,’ -said lawyer Kurbedinov.
The court did not satisfy any of the arguments of the defence and left the verdict in force.
‘We managed to do it with our defendants. There are elderly people there, already not young, as let’s say. The health of all of them is deteriorating. Morally holding on,’ – added Emil Kurbedinov.
Photo: ‘Crimean Solidarity’