Friends, the issue of the status of Crimea has remained controversial for many years. Many say that the current status of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea needs to be changed, some talk about creating a region, and others say that autonomy is very important. Let’s figure it out again!<\/p>\n
So, what\u2019s wrong with the current status of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol? Indeed, there cannot be autonomy on an administrative-territorial basis in a unitary state. However, we cannot talk about the Crimean region.<\/p>\n
Many people think that the region will become a fuse for separatism in Ukraine. But the Luh<\/span>ansk and Donetsk regions did not become these fuses, which means the problem is completely different<\/p>\n The team of the Crimean Tatar Resource Center clearly emphasizes the importance of creating national-territorial autonomy. No, this is not some kind of advantage, but only a form of self-determination for the indigenous peoples of Ukraine.<\/p>\n In fact, national-territorial autonomy is a legal mechanism for protecting the integrity of Ukraine. Why is this so?<\/p>\n After the deoccupation of Crimea, military administrations will first be created on the peninsula, and then military-civil administrations. During their operation, which may be 10 years, it will not be possible to hold elections, but do you believe that in at least 10 years the consciousness of the population of Crimea will change and they will be able to make the right choice?<\/p>\n This is where the national-territorial autonomy of Crimea comes in handy. It is she who is the guarantor of preventing separative sentiments on the peninsula.<\/p>\n National-territorial autonomy provides for quotas in representative bodies at all levels for representatives of the indigenous Crimean Tatar people. Such guaranteed representation of indigenous peoples in decision-making bodies, among other things, can prevent the adoption of decisions that are contrary to the interests and preservation of the integrity of Ukraine, because we all remember that the Crimean Tatars were and remain the core of resistance to the occupation of Crimea.<\/p>\n So what do you think about this?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Friends, the issue of the status of Crimea has remained controversial for many years. Many say that the current status of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea needs to be changed, some talk about creating a region, and others say that autonomy is very important. Let’s figure it out again! So, what\u2019s wrong with the current […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":47089,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[315],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-248859","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n