Friends, the deoccupation of Crimea is approaching and we need to understand what will happen next.<\/p>\n
The most common question among our audience is: what will happen to the collaborators?<\/p>\n
In fact, we must consider the degree of collaboration of each person in a particular situation. How, for example, can you compare an official or a soldier who took an oath to Ukraine and went over to the side of the occupier and a doctor who took the Hippocratic oath and continues to work and provide medical care to Ukrainians in the occupied territories? What actions should be taken? How can this be assessed?<\/p>\n
Now all these questions remain open. In this regard, the\u00a0CT<\/span>RC has developed a special methodology, which is an auxiliary tool so that people can themselves assess the extent of their collaboration.<\/p>\n We propose 12 indicators for determining responsibility in the sanctions policy dimension, which should be applied in their entirety. To calculate indicators for a specific person, one of the options is selected, and if several options can be selected at the same time, the one that gives the most points is selected. The scores of indicators 1 to 9 are added arithmetically and the scores of indicators 10 to 12 are subtracted from the resulting number.<\/p>\n 1. Citizenship<\/p>\n \u00a01.1. Citizen of Ukraine (regardless of other documents) (5)<\/p>\n 1.2. Non-citizen of Ukraine (0)<\/p>\n 2. Legality of stay in Crimea<\/p>\n 2.1.Criminal stay (arrival of foreigners in Crimea with the assistance of the Russian authorities, in compliance with its instructions or orders) (5)<\/p>\n 2.2.Illegal stay (initiative arrival of foreigners in Crimea contrary to the laws of Ukraine) (4)<\/p>\n 2.3.\u00a0 Stay with violations (citizens of Ukraine who arrived in Crimea hiding from law enforcement agencies or from responsibility for separatism) (2)<\/p>\n 2.4.\u00a0 Legal stay (residents of Crimea under Ukrainian law) (0)<\/p>\n 3. Special obligations to Ukraine<\/p>\n 3.1. An oath was given by\u00a0 a serviceman (except for military service and reserve) \u00a0(10)<\/p>\n 3.2. Person is the bearer of a state secret (6)<\/p>\n 3.3. An oath was given by another civil servant (including police, tax, etc.) (4)<\/p>\n 3.4.\u00a0 Other public commitment was given (local self-government, notaries, lawyers) (2)<\/p>\n 3.5. Person has no special obligations to Ukraine (0)<\/p>\n 4. Termination of obligations to Ukraine<\/p>\n 4.1.\u00a0 Person has not terminated his (her) obligations (5)<\/p>\n 4.2.\u00a0 Person has terminated his\/her obligations (passed the procedure of dismissal, from office) (0)<\/p>\n 5. Status in the system of occupation power<\/p>\n 5.1.\u00a0 Military service in favor of the Russian Federation (RF Armed Forces, Rosguard, except for \u201cconscription\u201d, \u201cmilitary assembly\u201d) (20)<\/p>\n 5.2.\u00a0 Militarized service in favor of the Russian Federation in punitive bodies interacting with the population (police, other punitive bodies of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, border service, FSO, FSB, penitentiary service) (19)<\/p>\n 5.3.\u00a0 Paramilitary services for the benefit of the Russian Federation, interacting with the population (18)<\/p>\n 5.4.\u00a0 Other service in favor of the Russian Federation in punitive bodies interacting with the population (investigative committee and prosecutor\u2019s office) (17)<\/p>\n 5.5.\u00a0 Judicial Service (Judges, Assistants of the Judges, Court Secretaries) (17)<\/p>\n 5.6.\u00a0 Public service in the federal and \u201cregional\u201d authorities of the Russian Federation (16)<\/p>\n 5.7.\u00a0 \u201cElected\u201d positions involving permanent performance of government functions (\u201cmayors\u201d, \u201cjustices of the peace\u201d) (16)<\/p>\n 5.8.\u00a0 \u201cMunicipal service\u201d in the territory of Crimea (14)<\/p>\n 5.9.\u00a0 \u201cElected\u201d positions that provide for the temporary performance of government functions (\u201clocal deputies\u201d, \u201cjurors\u201d) (12)<\/p>\n 5.10.\u00a0 Positions that are not authoritative but involve public functions (lawyers, private notaries, arbiters, arbitrators, inspectors, etc.) (10)<\/p>\n 5.11.\u00a0 Managers and responsible officials of enterprises, institutions, organizations, in particular in the fields of production, transport, communications, education, science, culture, media, which are formally or de facto under the control of the occupying authorities (8)<\/p>\n 5.12.\u00a0 Managers and responsible officials of enterprises, institutions, organizations, associations of citizens who are not under the control of the occupiers, but constantly or periodically perform the functions of servicing or ensuring the activities of the occupying authorities (6)<\/p>\n 6. Attitude to the tasks of the occupying power<\/p>\n 6.1.\u00a0 Initiative performance of tasks of the occupying power in its interests, using \u201cofficial opportunities\u201d (10)<\/p>\n 6.2.\u00a0 Execution of tasks of the occupying power within the framework of \u201cofficial obligations\u201d (0)<\/p>\n 7. Negative consequences of cooperation with the occupiers 30<\/p>\n 7.1.\u00a0 Committing international crimes (seizure of private property, conscription of Crimeans, deportation of Crimeans from Crimea, application of Russian laws, which grossly violated human rights, participation in aggression against Ukraine, its preparation and provision) (30)<\/p>\n 7.2.\u00a0 Gross violations of fundamental human rights (involvement in murder, torture, abduction, long-term imprisonment, especially ill-treatment, racial discrimination) (28)<\/p>\n 7.3.\u00a0 Other violations of human rights (imposition of fines, evictions, searches, violations of privacy, prohibition of meetings, organizations, media, interference in religious activities, etc.) (24)<\/p>\n 7.4.\u00a0 Violation of public interests (destruction or negative change of the actual state and regime of cultural heritage, natural objects, natural resources, anti-Ukrainian propaganda, active support of the policy of \u201cRussian world\u201d) (20)<\/p>\n 7.5.\u00a0 Committing corruption or other similar acts, gross errors or negligence that encumbered human rights or public interests (10)<\/p>\n 7.6.\u00a0 No significant negative consequences of cooperation with the occupiers were revealed (0)<\/p>\n 8. Duration of cooperation with the occupiers<\/p>\n 8.1.\u00a0 More than five years (5)<\/p>\n 8.2.\u00a0 Up to five years (3)<\/p>\n 8.3.\u00a0 Up to one year (2)<\/p>\n 8.4.\u00a0 Up to three months (0)<\/p>\n 9. Evaluation of the activities of the person by the occupiers<\/p>\n 9.1.\u00a0 Receiving state awards from the Russian Federation (10)<\/p>\n 9.2.\u00a0 Receiving of departmental (\u201crepublican, municipal\u201d) awards (8)<\/p>\n 9.3.\u00a0 Public positive mentioning of a person in the media controlled by the occupiers (6)<\/p>\n 9.4.\u00a0 Encouragement of a person in material or disciplinary order (4)<\/p>\n 9.5.\u00a0 Promotion of a person on \u201cservice\u201d with the consent of the occupiers (except automatic) (2)<\/p>\n 9.6.\u00a0 No special positive assessment of the occupiers\u2019 activities was detected (0)<\/p>\n 10. Positive needs for cooperation with the occupiers<\/p>\n 10.1.\u00a0 Ensuring the critical needs of the population (medicine, veterinary medicine, fire-fighting, sea and mountain rescue, ensuring the functioning of water, electricity, gas, sewerage and public roads, ensuring the production and distribution of food, medicines and basic necessities) (20)<\/p>\n 10.2.\u00a0 Providing other needs of the population (primary and secondary education, library and museum affairs, local transport,\u00a0functioning of the Internet, charity, animal rescue) (10)<\/p>\n 10.3.\u00a0 No significant positive consequences of cooperation with the occupiers were found (0)<\/p>\n 11. Grounds for termination of cooperation with the occupiers<\/p>\n 11.1.\u00a0 Termination at the initiative of the occupiers due to disloyalty (10)<\/p>\n 11.2.\u00a0 Initiative termination (5)<\/p>\n 11.3.\u00a0 Termination at the initiative of the occupiers due to\u00a0unsuitability or \u201cviolation\u201d (0)<\/p>\n 11.4.\u00a0 Termination due to external circumstances (0)<\/p>\n 12. General factors to be taken into account<\/p>\n 12.1.\u00a0 Sabotage of actions contrary to public interests or human rights (20)<\/p>\n 12.2.\u00a0 Acting in the public interest or human rights (15)<\/p>\n 12.3.\u00a0 Professional specialization of the person (10)<\/p>\n 12.4.\u00a0 Unsatisfactory financial condition (10)<\/p>\n 12.5.\u00a0 Objective difficulties of leaving Crimea (sick relatives, family) (10)<\/p>\n This classification can be an important tool for sanctions policy, both for Ukrainian government agencies and international organizations.<\/p>\n Based on this methodology, we created a test: Are you subject to sanctions?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Friends, the deoccupation of Crimea is approaching and we need to understand what will happen next. The most common question among our audience is: what will happen to the collaborators? In fact, we must consider the degree of collaboration of each person in a particular situation. How, for example, can you compare an official or […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":233139,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[315],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-244913","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n