{"id":132683,"date":"2020-07-07T08:30:15","date_gmt":"2020-07-07T05:30:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.ctrcenter.org4825-v-kachestve-eksperta-po-delu-islyamova-vystupila-sotrudnik-fsb-2"},"modified":"2020-07-07T08:30:15","modified_gmt":"2020-07-07T05:30:15","slug":"4825-v-kachestve-eksperta-po-delu-islyamova-vystupila-sotrudnik-fsb-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ctrcenter.org\/en\/4825-v-kachestve-eksperta-po-delu-islyamova-vystupila-sotrudnik-fsb-2","title":{"rendered":"An FSB officer acted as an expert in the Islyamov case"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/p>\n

FSB expert Anna Korotkova refused to give the address of the institution within which the examination of Islyamov’s interview was conducted, and also did not disclose the methodology by which the examination was conducted.<\/p>\n

\n

“Refusing to give the address of the FSB institute, the expert explained that she could only name the zip code, but did not give it. My question is how this relates to the law “On State Expertise”, according to which the expert should be independent, while Korotkova explained that she is an acting FSB officer and an expert in this case. However, apparently, we didn’t interrogate the expert, who is also the FSB officer in the court, because she refused to present her passport, showing only her identity card”,- the message says.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n